Has Khazanah stopped growing?
A reader's Q&A.
I’ve probably committed one of the gravest sins of online headline writing: using the same buzzword in the headline twice.
In this case it’s “Khazanah”, which I also used on Thursday.
So, the website will look a tad off.
But, sometimes the occasion calls for it.
Also “Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund” is a mouthful.
You’re reading The Malaysianist, a newsletter on money and power. Fuel up with a monthly, annual or founding member plan.
P.S. The founding member tier doesn’t have a ceiling; you can go as high as you want — it’s the ultimate supporter badge that comes with an annual report.
It’ll also grant you access to Brainjam with bangers such as this 👇🏽
And, yes, you can upgrade subscription tiers at any time.
Mulling a group purchase for family, friends and colleagues? I’ve got you. Group subscriptions come with discounts, too.
The newsletter has grown to the point where I’m getting email requests1.
I have two in the inbox, and I’ll kill one right now.
A reader asked me to benchmark Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund Khazanah Nasional against a group of similar funds and crunch the data to see whether our sovereign wealth fund is “stalling”.
This was after I published Thursday’s newsletter on Khazanah.
Here’s what I did and what I found: